California Property & Casualty (CA-PC) · Chapter 8

California Property & Casualty: California P&C Law — Cancellation, Unfair Practices, FAIR Plan, CAARP & Ethics

5 free practice questions from the 43 in this chapter of StudyWren Insurance. Pick an answer and check it to see the explanation. Part of the free California Property & Casualty practice exam.

California P&C Law — Cancellation, Unfair Practices, FAIR Plan, CAARP & Ethics CA-PC-08-459

A licensed producer wants to submit an application for FAIR Plan coverage on behalf of a client. Which of the following is required for the producer to be eligible to submit such an application?

Show the answer

The answer is A: The producer must hold a valid California property-casualty license and register with the FAIR Plan as a broker.

Submitting business to the FAIR Plan takes two things: a valid, active California property-casualty license and registration with the FAIR Plan as a broker. The plan does not appoint producers, require plan-specific training, or require a set number of declinations by admitted insurers; Insurance Code §10093 asks only that the applicant, after diligent effort, was unable to get basic property insurance through normal channels. Nor must the producer be a surplus lines broker, who places business with nonadmitted insurers in a separate market.

Reviewed in our October 2026 California fact-check.

Report a problem with this question

California P&C Law — Cancellation, Unfair Practices, FAIR Plan, CAARP & Ethics CA-PC-08-468

A FAIR Plan policy covers a dwelling in a high-risk wildfire area. The policyholder also buys a Difference in Conditions (DIC) policy from a private insurer to supplement it. Which statement accurately describes the relationship between the FAIR Plan policy and the DIC policy?

Show the answer

The answer is B: The FAIR Plan policy is a named-perils form, and the DIC policy adds coverages it lacks, such as theft and liability.

The FAIR Plan sells named-perils basic property insurance (the §10091(c) definition: perils of the standard fire policy and extended coverage plus vandalism and malicious mischief). Its dwelling policy builds in fire, lightning, internal explosion and smoke and sells some other perils as options, and the plan does not sell liability, theft or water damage coverage. A DIC policy from a private insurer is designed to combine with the FAIR Plan policy and supply those missing coverages, bringing the package closer to a homeowners policy; flood and earthquake are typically bought as separate policies. The FAIR Plan policy is therefore not all-risk, the DIC policy does not take over the fire losses the FAIR Plan policy covers, and no rule requires the DIC policy to come from the same insurer; the FAIR Plan does not sell DIC policies, so it is bought from a different insurer.

Reviewed in our October 2026 California fact-check.

Report a problem with this question

California P&C Law — Cancellation, Unfair Practices, FAIR Plan, CAARP & Ethics CA-PC-08-479

A risk is placed with the California State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) for workers' compensation coverage. Which of the following statements is true regarding eligibility to place business with SCIF under California Insurance Code §11784?

Show the answer

The answer is B: Any employer in California may tender a workers' compensation risk to SCIF, regardless of size or industry, subject to its accident-prevention and safe-carrying limits.

SCIF was created as a competitive workers' compensation carrier: it competes with private insurers for any employer's business while also serving as a guaranteed market. Under Insurance Code §11784(c), State Fund may decline a risk that fails the accident-prevention requirements or is beyond its safe carrying capacity, but otherwise it may not refuse a workers' compensation risk tendered with the premium, so eligibility is not limited to employers already declined by admitted insurers. Treating SCIF as available only after a decline is wrong, no count of declinations is set by statute, and SCIF serves private as well as public sector employers.

Reviewed in our October 2026 California fact-check.

Report a problem with this question

California P&C Law — Cancellation, Unfair Practices, FAIR Plan, CAARP & Ethics CA-PC-08-492

An employee is injured while working at a temporary job site in Arizona for their California-based employer. The employer's California workers' compensation policy lists Arizona under its 'Other States Insurance' provision. How does that provision apply?

Show the answer

The answer is A: It lets the California policy pay the benefits that Arizona's workers' compensation law requires for this employee.

The 'other states' insurance provision of a workers' compensation policy extends the policy to pay the benefits required by the workers' compensation law of the other states listed in the policy when covered employees are injured working there. With Arizona listed, the policy pays the benefits Arizona law requires. It does not require a lawsuit first, impose California benefit levels on Arizona, or bar coverage outside California.

Reviewed in our October 2026 California fact-check.

Report a problem with this question

California P&C Law — Cancellation, Unfair Practices, FAIR Plan, CAARP & Ethics CA-PC-08-497

A producer is explaining a complex commercial general liability policy to a small business owner. To act ethically and in accordance with California standards, the producer should:

Show the answer

The answer is A: Use layperson's language to ensure the client understands the coverage and its limitations.

A producer who explains coverage in plain, layperson's language, including its limits and exclusions, helps the client understand what is being bought. Misrepresenting policy terms or benefits, as in telling a client the policy covers everything, is prohibited (Ins. Code §780 and §790.03(a)), and leaving out exclusions to avoid worrying the client gives a false picture of the coverage. Technical jargon used to show expertise does not help the client understand the coverage.

Reviewed in our October 2026 California fact-check.

Report a problem with this question